Wednesday, April 4, 2007

Marajuana the real cancer cure?

Here's some snippets from an article that says MJ may well be the cancer cure! Can you beat that? Wouldn't that just be too funny. We have had a major WAR on drugs with marajuana being touted as so bad for us, and we are busy RAISING awareness FOR Cancer. Turns out that the drug we are putting people in jail for illegal use and distribution of may well BE the cancer CURE. Too ironic? Read on:

Cannabinoids As Cancer Hope
exerpts from the article by Paul Armentano, Senior Policy Analyst

“Cannabinoids possess … anticancer activity [and may] possibly represent a new class of anti-cancer drugs that retard cancer growth, inhibit angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels) and the metastatic spreading of cancer cells.

So concludes a comprehensive review published in the October 2005 issue of the scientific journal Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry. Not familiar with the emerging body of research touting cannabis' ability to stave the spread of certain types of cancers? You're not alone.

For over 30 years, US politicians and bureaucrats have systematically turned a blind eye to scientific research indicating that marijuana may play a role in cancer prevention -- a finding that was first documented in 1974.

That year, a research team at the Medical College of Virginia (acting at the behest of the federal government) discovered that cannabis inhibited malignant tumor cell growth in culture and in mice. According to the study's results, reported nationally in an Aug. 18, 1974, Washington Post newspaper feature, administration of marijuana's primary cannabinoid THC, "slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent."

Despite these favorable preclinical findings, US government officials dismissed the study (which was eventually published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute in 1975), and refused to fund any follow-up research until conducting a similar –- though secret –- clinical trial in the mid-1990s. That study, conducted by the US National Toxicology Program to the tune of $2 million concluded that mice and rats administered high doses of THC over long periods experienced greater protection against malignant tumors than untreated controls.

In 2000, they reported in the journal Nature Medicine that injections of synthetic THC eradicated malignant gliomas (brain tumors) in one-third of treated rats, and prolonged life in another third by six weeks.

In 2003, researchers at the University of Milan in Naples, Italy, reported that non-psychoactive compounds in marijuana inhibited the growth of glioma cells in a dose dependent manner and selectively targeted and killed malignant cancer cells.

The following year, researchers reported in the journal of the American Association for Cancer Research that marijuana's constituents inhibited the spread of brain cancer in human tumor biopsies.

In a related development, a research team from the University of South Florida further noted that THC can also selectively inhibit the activation and replication of gamma herpes viruses. The viruses, which can lie dormant for years within white blood cells before becoming active and spreading to other cells, are thought to increase one's chances of developing cancers such as Karposis Sarcoma, Burkitts lymphoma, and Hodgkins disease.

More recently, investigators published pre-clinical findings demonstrating that cannabinoids may play a role in inhibiting cell growth of colectoral cancer, skin carcinoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer, among other conditions.

THC proved far more beneficial – selectively decreasing the proliferation of malignant cells and inducing apoptosis more rapidly than its synthetic alternative while simultaneously leaving healthy cells unscathed.

US politicians have been little swayed by these results, and remain steadfastly opposed to the notion of sponsoring – or even acknowledging – this growing body of clinical research, preferring instead to promote the unfounded notion that cannabis use causes cancer."

2 comments:

CatherineAnn said...

All this and a mellow high, how could you go wrong? Seriously though, a lot of energy is directly at "protecting us from ourselves."

Joy! said...

Alot of energy goes into "protecting us" for our own good.
You know, since a glass of red wine now lowers cholesterol and mellows us...and the experts have decided it's a good thing
the day can't be TOO FAR away that they will decide that mj is good for some of us.
I don't smoke-don't like the feel regardless of the after affects, but I say I should be allowed to decide for myself.
Same as a glass of wine.
Now can you imagine if they decided that white sugar was illegal-would there be a national outcry!
LOL
And we give it to babies don't we.
Well, in Europe they give watered down wine to infants to quiet them. Same same!